Three metrological institutes (don’t) say they are Jesus, at least two of them have to be right – Cornucopia?

The article contains advertisements in the form of Kjell & Co. affiliate links.

Now the three YR, SMHI and FMI say it will rain here tomorrow Sunday. They say different amounts of rain and different times, so now it will be interesting to see who is right. They all seem to use the same models for their predictions, but they weigh different variables differently.

Vackertväder.se is, as usual, the weather service I use and now it lists hour-by-hour weather forecasts It will rain here tomorrow. By the way, according to My Netatmo rain gauge 0.4mm of rain yesterday around the same time it hit Metallica.

Now, however, there will be more rain.

To summarize, the forecast is as follows, and this applies as read at 19:20. As you know, a prediction is only valid until it becomes invalid.

Thus, the average time for the onset of rain is 04:20 and the average precipitation for these three forecasts is 6.8 mm.

At 4:20 and 6.8 mm in total during the day tomorrow is the blog forecast.

Then we’ll see who is right. Only one person can be Jesus, As you know. But atheism also exists. The weather institutes, however, do not say that they are Jesus, but voluntarily admit that they only assume weight. But we’re excited and we’re looking forward to what they have to say anyway.

By the way, I was about to write an article again about possible water shortages due to political decisions and reluctance to invest, and not due to water shortages in Sweden. Saving water in Sweden does not produce more water in Africa. But I wrote an article in 2018, so there must be a link.

“The problem, then, is that the municipalities have disappeared and have not expanded the water supply in line with the expanding population and economy. Water is plentiful, as are naive, incompetent politicians.“

Otherwise, we will get climate change even if all requirements for reducing carbon dioxide emissions are met in accordance with the agreement. Why municipalities refuse to expand water supplies to keep pace with climate change is not clear. Maybe they think they can avoid it, but even if we end fossil fuels globally tomorrow, we still have climate change, so it’s just a matter of getting more water. Because there are any number of them. If nothing else, water is the most common commodity on earth and it is abundant in the sea. It’s a matter of energy for desalination, and you can, if need be, ditch wind turbines for desalination when it’s windy. Which often happens at sea.

Water is plentiful and political will is scarce. Nobody thanks the proactive politician who avoids trouble.

However, there may be a shortage of rainwater for cultivation. After all, the 100 liters of water needed per 1 kilogram of meat or 1 liter of milk is a matter of rainwater that waters the grass on which cows graze. Then they urinate in the same place again, so it’s a clean cycle and doesn’t lead to a water shortage. The refusal to eat the meat of Swedish grazing animals does not lead to more water in Africa, but here the water flows into the Baltic or North Sea where it turns into salt water, not Africa. And the more dams we demolish, the faster the water flows and does not have time to become groundwater.

It has now been five years since 2018, and how many municipalities have expanded their water supplies?