DealMakerz

Complete British News World

Review: Kaleidoscope (Season 1) |  top of the movie

Review: Kaleidoscope (Season 1) | top of the movie


A heist series with several game modes


Netflix is ​​thinking about new experiences. The basic idea of ​​their new series “Kaleidoscope” is that it should be possible to watch in any order while still being suspense and suspense. But whether he actually succeeded is not entirely certain.




It is not entirely easy to explain the procedure in series kaleidoscope. Series usually have the same order of play for everyone watching. Ring number one becomes two, then it becomes three, and so on. But in kaleidoscope The order of the rings is random. They all begin with the illustrative section labeled black and end with white. But what the color arrangement looks like after that varies from person to person. Therefore, it is not certain that you will watch the series in the same order as me or your friend.

The basic plot remains the same for everyone – a familiar and well-tried plot. We follow a group of people who pull off a grand heist against a solid bank vault. There are securities that must be worth several billion. The only problem is that these papers are behind an incredibly strict security system so that no unauthorized person can access them. During the course of the series, we will see what happens before and after the robbery. The big question you want to discover next is why did things turn out the way they did, who you can’t trust or who you are.

A colorful kaleidoscope without a lot of content

You must give Netflix credit Because they sometimes dare to experiment. Sometimes it works, as with black mirrors Interactive loops, and sometimes fails, as with Bear Grylls Interactive series. The idea behind kaleidoscope She is wise and interesting. To be able to endlessly discuss with your friends about the same series: who is fake, who can be trusted, how it turned out the way it did. But despite an interesting idea and a really great series, you don’t really succeed along the way. Should Netflix try the concept again? I doubt.

Because like a normal kaleidoscope it is It is very good to watch the Netflix series of the same name. But once you look closer, you’ll quickly notice that there isn’t much in the way of content. It is mostly a background of glass. The plot, which at first seems promising and exciting, becomes annoying in the long run. It ends up being a bit like hanging out with your friends, who can never stop talking about this cool thing you weren’t involved in. You kind of understand what they’ve been through, but not really.

In the end, it’s almost tempting to skip to the final episode Let’s see how that actually happened. And when the series ends, it does so in an orderly, well-planned way… Heist of the Mammoth lies flat. That is, a long way to nothing. However, what is not consistent are certain representative efforts. Then in the first place Giancarlo Esposito Which pretty much holds the series on its own. But it would have needed more help from the series’ creators and a plot to make it something more memorable and more than a weak third.

See also  Britain wants to monitor asylum seekers in chains

In conclusion, “Kaleidoscope” is a very nice series with an interesting core idea. Maybe it can succeed in the future and become as big and memorable as it should have been. But who knows, maybe my impressions are caused by watching the series in the wrong order?

Further reading: