A short election campaign can explain the heated debate

An unusually short election campaign may be the result of the focus on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and even the state of opinion, explanations for the “barrage” of profanity during the recent SR debate. This is what Aftonbladet’s Lena Milen wrote in an analysis.

Remember, among other things, how Marta Stenevy (Member of Parliament) said “absolutely” when asked if Jimmy Akesson was a Nazi – which she quickly retracted – and that Annie Love (center) accused Ebba Bush (KD) of populism.

Mellin expects the higher pitch to lead to a worse democracy.

“That fewer people are voting because they don’t feel involved in what is potentially amusing but not too dangerous.”

On the SR podcast “The Political Game,” Thomas Ramberg said the value of information in the debate was “relatively low”. Most notable, according to Ramberg, is how Prime Minister Magdalena Anderson (s) Ulf Christerson (centre) urged cooperation on criminal policy. It was rejected by the leader M.

– This is not the state of mind when you have a week until the election.

Fellow Socialist Friedrich Furtenbach says he doesn’t think it goes well with voters when party leaders speak into each other’s mouths.

It was a heated debate today, says Fortenbach.