The questioning was discussed in Parliament – “The quality and availability of services will deteriorate and the economy will experience a crisis if the model of government is pushed through Parliament in June”

The opposition’s questioning over healthcare reform was discussed during Tuesday’s plenary session. The National Coalition Party, Christian Democrats, Royals No and Sanvinlandarna together stand behind the questioning.

Minister of Family and Welfare Krista Kero (SDP) defends the reform proposal and states that this is the first proposal that has been interpreted as constitutional.

“The goal is to reduce disparities in well-being and health, improve access to services and improve cost control,” Kiuru said.

She emphasized that reform does not mean the impossibility of purchasing services from private parties.

The constitutional committee unanimously approved the bill on May 21. At that time, the chairman of the committee said you ren (SDP) that some corrections are required, but no corrections are so extensive as to disrupt the process or change the current schedule.

opposing another opinion

Opposition parties believe, among other things, that the proposed social and healthcare reform does not lead to citizens getting the care they need faster, nor does it reduce spending.

Mia Laihou (Sammal) He says the biggest problem with the reform proposal is the funding model. According to her, this will mean that large cities will have to finance, for example, new schools, roads and day care centers with half the budget.

“The quality and availability of services will deteriorate and the economy will experience a crisis if the government model is pushed through the Swedish parliament in June,” the National Coalition party said. Anna Kesa Ikonen.

The symbol also indicates distrust of the government.

45 invalid arguments

Aki Linden (The Social Democratic Party) says the questioning of the opposition is the weakest it has ever seen.

– Found 45 incorrect arguments or incorrect interpretations. So actually 45!

– This reform respects linguistic rights and is done for the sake of concrete care, not administrative structures. Linden says bureaucracy is diminishing and funding is increasing.

Veronica Ren Keefe (SFP) said she understood that the opposition should be against the proposal on principled grounds. She says it is still important not to focus solely on threatening images.

– The final amounts are still not known to everyone and the accounts will continue to change. But the current funding model is much better than the one that the National Coalition Party supported, for example, in the previous election period.

Joha BelvasThe head of the center’s parliamentary group put forward the idea that the interrogation is really just a game before the local elections.

The government’s goal is for the Riksdag to agree to the reform before the summer break at the Riksdag.